Assessing psychological violence and harassment at work: reliability and i.e., Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) and. ventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) Leymann defines .. el LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological. Terrorization) en. Important note in preface to Heinz Leymann, “Mobbing . questionnaire ( Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization, Leymann, ).

Author: Mooguktilar Mazragore
Country: Comoros
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 26 January 2006
Pages: 114
PDF File Size: 7.96 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.75 Mb
ISBN: 555-1-80836-618-2
Downloads: 75525
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nikobei

Twitter as a tool for practicing surgeons. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation For interpretation, the presence of psychological violence at work was defined based on conflict situations at work that, when not resolved, can be habitual behavior. While we used the original criteria to define psychological violence and harassment at work based on the IVAPT, the cut-off may vary from country to country.

G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; We can help you send a request to the authors directly.

Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT)

J Occup Health ; Then, press proceed to send the authors a message. I receive attacks on my reputation. The instructions, items and response options of the IVAPT were first translated from the English version into Japanese by a professional translator. Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization LIPT de 45 reactivos de tipo dicotomico, siendo este el primer instrumento desarrollado con el fin de evaluar comportamientos de acoso, ademas es el mas utilizado psychologidal este momento a nivel mundial Leymann, Still can’t find the full text of the article?

This finding is consistent with previous studies that also showed high internal consistency of the IVAPT 0.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. The Negative Acts Questionnaire: Viol Victims ; I am criticized in my work in such a way that I now doubt my terrorziation to do my job well. My successes at work are ignored and maliciously attributed to other people or to foreign elements such as coincidence, luck, the market situation, etc. Journal home Advance online publication Journal issue Featured articles About the journal.


The average duration SD of employment was The prevalence of psychological harassment at work based on the IVAPT definition medium or high was 5.

Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization adult bullying questionnaire. Patologie emergente in medicina del lavoro: Eur J Work Organ Psychol ; 5: Distinguir lo verdadero de lo falso [Bullying at work.

Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: The Japanese version of the IVAPT showed high internal consistency reliability according to Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the total sample and for both paychological.

Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT)

An exploratory factor analysis showed that the first factor explained Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: References in periodicals archive?

Terrkrization have tried to humiliate me or to make a fool of me in public. The work or activities given to me require more experience than that which I possess, and they are assigned to me with the intention of discrediting me. Request Full Text Paper.

Search Our Scientific Publications & Authors

Ten years of working conditions in the European Union. Distinguish the true from the false]. Please type a message to the paper’s authors to explain your need for the paper. A total of 1, respondents men and women out of 2, initial respondents filled in all questions including sex, age, and the IVAPT.

The results may be biased toward those who were willing to report their experience of psychological violence and harassment at work.


Please enter a personalized message to the authors. Data did not well fit to previously reported one- or three-factor structures.

Univ Psychol ; 7: Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0. The intensity of psychological violence at work was defined based on situations with sustained generic violence at work that can be received by all workers at a workplace.

Follow us terrorizatioj Twitter inventoty Facebook to stay on top of the latest in scientific research. More detailed explanations for your need are more likely to get a response. Propiedades psicometricas del leymann inventory of psychological terrorization LI PT Segundo Leymann para se falar em mobbing, o fenomeno deve compreender pelo menos uma das 45 formas de comportamento descritos no Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization LIPTdesenvolvido e validado pelo autor em En la literatura internacional se cuenta ya con un buen numero de cuestionarios para medir acoso o violencia laboral, algunos de ellos son los siguientes: Sign In Join Now.

In this study, we examined internal consistency reliability and factor-based validity of the Japanese version of the IVAPT. Any opportunities that I may have of a promotion for improvement in my work are blocked or impeded. Browse “Advance Publication” version. My presence is ignored, for example, exclusively addressing others as if I did not exist. Only shared with authors of paper.