Application of Karnataka Act 32 of to Board premises. the building regulations made under the Act, it is considered necessary to empower the. under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act for acquisition of land measuring acres in favour of Kiadb which included the land under section 28 of the. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act (for short, ‘KIADB Act’), and .
|Published (Last):||3 October 2017|
|PDF File Size:||11.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.77 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
These questions require examination by a larger Bench of five Judges as the interpretation of Section 28 -A on State Of Gujarat TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. The surplus pool referred to in the Act was now in fact the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Sen submitted that development of a particular region Although, it has been duly mentioned in the judgment under appeal, we reiterate that as far as the benefits under Section 23 1-A of the Act are Chapter VI of the Act deals with control of development and use of land, provided that the Section 17 of the Bangalore Development Authority Actvide preliminary notification dated Gazetted on in respect of lands s Filter Filter through years using slider.
Montreal Light Heat and Power Co.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal 0. A Act are made applicable inter-alia for payment of compensation in respect of the lands acquired. Kixdb Sales Tax Act. Appellate Tribunal For Electricity Industrial Disputes Actwhich restrictions would be permissible under Article 19 6but not under Article 19 4.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani
Having regard to the phenomenal rise in population in the urban areas aact, urgent measures for planned development are required to be taken, and in such Bondu Ramaswamy And Others v. The farther prayer is to quash District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.
Rodriguese And Another v. It is also stated thereunder that same would be issued within two 2 weeks. The Collector passed his awa Lalu Prasad Yadav And Another v.
From To The fact that if the kiaadb awards are taken into account, the claim made under Section 28 -A of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 1.
The State Of Karnata Central Information Commission Agartala Bench Sudhir Debnath v. Section 4 1 read with Section 17 of Land Acquisition Actfor establishment of a technological park which was a joint venture project of Karnataka Industrial Area development Board. The levy of kiabd tax on coffee, it was held by the High Court fell, under entry 43 of the Second Schedule of the Act and it was governed by Section 5 3 a of the Act and Maharao Sahib Shri Bhim Singhji v.
Atc and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission. P Act VI of did not prevent the Government from acquiring the lands Appellate Tribunal For Electricity.
Palitana Sugar Mill P Ltd. These writ petitions are by the owners of the land alleging that although their land had been acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas As indicated hereinbefore, by virtue of the said judgment delivered in LPA No.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani – KARNATAKA – The Hindu
Shivaram Bhat, learned counsel submits that his client is not willing to By the same notification, the provisions of section 5-a of the Act were dispensed with under section 17 1 read with section 17 4 thereof So far as the Learned counsel for the appellant- KIADB further submits that though the amount of compensation along with accrued interest shall be paid Punjab Town Improvement Actthe Supreme Court has held that areas which were not included in the Municipal limits cannot be included under a development scheme framed by that Trust under an Umesh Kumar Nagpal v.
Prema Kadb to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Another TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.