The Semitic languages / edited by Robert Hetzron. Other Authors. Hetzron, Robert. Published. New York: Routledge, Content Types. text. Carrier Types. : The Semitic Languages (Routledge Language Family Series) ( ): Robert Hetzron: Books. THE NEAR AND MIDDLE EAST. ROBERT HETZRON (ed.): The Semitic languages. xx, pp. London: Routledge, ? Nildeke to Goldziher (7/8/ ).
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||14 November 2016|
|PDF File Size:||13.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Click here to sign up. Contributors who publish with this journal agree to the following license and copyright agreement: And despite the diver- sity of the shape of the article in these languages, it is likely that they originate in a small number of forms.
Reconstructing Proto-Semitic and Models of Classification derived passive verbal form with prefixed n the N-Stemwhereas Aramaic, Ethiopian Semitic, and the Modern South Arabian languages do not a prefixed n is found in Ethiopian Semitic and Modern South Arabian, mainly with quadriliteral roots, but has no derivational value.
This scheme can be found in several other older handbooks, e. Hetzron proposed the branching that is illustrated in Figure 9. These 11 locations in All: However, in Central Semitic, all of the prefixes for a particular verb stem have the same vowel, either a or i.
The Semitic Languages – Robert Hetzron – Google Books
Notes Includes bibliographical references and index. Log In Sign Up. Models of Classification of the Semitic Languages 9. The same applies to some Languaegs languages cf. In other words, it is simply what is left of West Semitic once Central Semitic breaks away. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal an exclusive right of first publication in paper and electronic form. Even languzges, the L-Stem, along with the other two features discussed above, favors the existence of a South Semitic sub-family.
Such shared innovations, as they are called, are the only features that are significant for genetic subgrouping. The Modern South Arabian Languages. Shared innovations in Central Semitic langkages. Even the derivational value of the L-Stem can be seen as a shared retention.
Robert Hetzron – Wikipedia
Notify me of new comments via email. Open to the public Book; Illustrated English Unknown library hetzzron Models of Classification of the Semitic Languages in this case it seems a deep and significant enough development that it is unlikely to be the result of either parallel development or areal diffusion.
Kuteva Language Contact and Grammatical Change. View online Borrow Buy Freely available Show 0 more links None of your libraries hold this item. MSA Ethiopian Figure 9. Generalization of -t- in the hetzon suffix conjugation.
Even if we accept that all of the Central Semitic articles do come from a single morpheme cf. The idea that both the family tree and wave models are necessary in order to provide a complete picture of the subgroup- ing of Semitic is certainly not new, but it is an idea that has not yet received suffi- cient attention. Perhaps for Hittite, too, it was not that Hurrian and Hattic had such consonants, but that Ssemitic was not in contact with a language with did not have these consonants.
One looks in lanhuages for any vestiges of the old yaqattal form in any of the Central Semitic languages. Areal features and parallel developments in Central Semitic In this section, we will look at some of the features that are common to Central Semitic, but which cannot be attributed convincingly to shared innovation. Problems in Comparative Linguistics Oxford: Schemes of classification have been challenged or updated not only because of disagreement among scholars as pertains to method or relevance of features, but also because advances lznguages the scholarship of languages hstzron ancient and modern repeatedly result in an improved understanding of the subgrouping of the family.
Australian National University Library.
Robert Hetzron (ed.): The Semitic Languages
The prefix conjugation yaqtulu which replaced the form yaqattal hetzrn doubling of the middle radical, attested in Akkadian iparrasEthiopic, and South Arabian. Semitic languages — Grammar. I was just about to start reading Faber this evening and hinneh!
In this view, which was based as much on the ancient location of the languages as on shared linguistic features, there exist three main sub-families within Semitic see Figure 9. In fact, of the most recent monograph- length treatments of comparative Semitic excluding the works of the present authorsonly Belova et al.
Faber;8 argues that certain assimilation rules present in the Hebrew hithpael conjugation, and in the various Aramaic t-stems, suggest the presence of pharyngealization, a fea- ture still present in Arabic. The authors are authorised by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
But the t-form can also be created from a basic G-Stem verb, to semiitc a reciprocal or associ- ative meaning; cf. In this article, Faber outlines the traditional approach to the Semitic languages as well as a new approach first introduced by Robert Hetzron based smeitic shared innovations. Their presence hetzzron Arabic is a shared reten- tion from an earlier ancestor, not an innovation shared exclusively by Arabic and Ethiopian Semitic.
The same form is also rarely attested in early Akkadian, but its use there seems to be quite different; again, no such form is attested in either Ethiopian Semitic or the Mod- ern South Arabian languages. Ethiopian Akkadian Figure 9. This point is highlighted by the fact that F. We were unable to find this edition in any bookshop we are able to search.