Hegel or Spinozafirst appeared in after an eight-year near-hiatus in. Macherey’s work. As Warren Montag argues, it marked a divergence. Macherey’s work enters this debate by attempting to save Marxism from this apparent historical refutation. The promise of Hegel or Spinoza. Hegel or Spinoza is the first English-language translation of the modern classic Hegel ou Spinoza. Pierre Macherey provides a surgically precise interrogation o.
|Published (Last):||11 July 2010|
|PDF File Size:||10.59 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.39 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The book exposes a set of original conflicts that subtend more familiar ro terrain: The Problem of Attributes pp. As Macherey writes in the introduction to the second edition of the book.
Macherey’s deliberate inversion of chronology is important here since his arguments reveal the paradoxical Spinozism of some of Hegel’s positions. The translation of Hegel or Spinoza is Macherey’s meticulous undoing of Hegel’s reading of Spinoza, in order to expose a deeper connection between the two philosophies, nicely accentuates some of the tensions framing recent discussions within contemporary continental political philosophy, where the perceived merits, and precise political utility, of Hegel and Spinoza’s philosophy continue to be debated.
We welcome work that engages with and furthers a range of critical epistemological approaches, puts theory to work in innovative ways, and consciously navigates the fraught politics of knowledge production within and beyond the academy.
ON HEGEL OR SPINOZA
Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves. Project MUSE Mission Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Wood – – International Philosophical Quarterly 51 3: Hegel or Spinoza is a classic. This article has no associated abstract. Warren Montag, author of Bodies, Masses, Power: Hegel or Spinoza is, therefore, a rich, engaging, and carefully constructed philosophical work that offers its readers nuanced readings of Spinoza and Hegel.
First chapter available from Society mxcherey Space. Hegel, Descartes and Spinoza. A Dialectics of Encounter pp. For the ‘Groupe Spinoza’ in the ‘s, not only was Spinoza’s philosophy viewed as a necessary ‘detour’ to clarify Marx’s relation to Hegel Althusser, but Hegel’s own relation to Spinoza was also deemed worthy of close analysis for its own contribution to Marxist theory.
Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. We will look forward to reading the results! Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
He argues that Spinoza’s philosophy of substance requires no notion of subject, or negativity, to drive itself forward, and that his critique of teleology, together with the very productivity of his concept of causa sui give rise to a dynamic concept of substance.
Published April 1, Spinoza Now The interdisciplinary relevance of Spinoza today. Bruno Bosteels sponoza – Historical Materialism 22 2: History of Western Philosophy.
Badiou later assessed his debts to Spinoza, and critiqued the ontological basis of Spinoza’s thought; Macherey published over a number of years a five-volume study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Substance does not precede its modes or lie behind their apparent reality, as a metaphysical foundation or a rational condition, but, in its absolute immanence, it is nothing other than the act of expressing itself immediately in all its modes, an act that is not itself determined through the relations of modes to each other but that is to the contrary their effective cause p.
Hegel ou Spinoza Pierre Macherey Paris: Hegel or Spinoza is the first English-language translation of the modern classic Hegel ou Spinoza. Indeed, Macherey positions Hegel and Spinoza in close proximity here, since neither configures a logic of the subject.
Many of these interventions began in the ‘Groupe Spinoza’ set up by Althusser inand whose membership included Badiou and Macherey. Perhaps this mode of this final question also illustrates the historical specificity of Macherey’s work, tied spijoza it was to the Spinozaa reconfiguration of a radical Marxist politics and philosophy.
Project MUSE – Hegel or Spinoza
For Spinoza, the only place for the subject is as ‘a relation between existences’ p. He was editor of Society and Space from Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus.
Henry Southgate – – Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 3: In developing this philosophical dynamic of reading Spinoza in Hegel, which is never simply a deconstruction of one reading or another, Macherey reveals to his readers that Hegel is closest to Spinoza when he tries hardest to distance himself from him: Hegel or Spinoza is a surgically precise interrogation of the points of misreading of Spinoza by Hegel.
However, whilst Hegel’s process-like formulation is compromised, in the last instance, by his evolutionism, there nonetheless remains something within his notion of infinity that draws him closer to Spinoza, for whom eternity escapes duration and ‘coincides with its infinite existence in act’ p.
Hegel views Spinoza’s measured and purely rational usage of negation as eliciting a too formal, and restrictive meaning, being associated solely with those finite modes, which have a determined existence and can, therefore, contain contradiction or differencebut not with substance itself, which remains resolutely positive and expansive p. Spinoza and His Contemporaries. Duffy – – Ashgate.