The Goos-Hanchen Shift. When describing total internal reflection of a plane wave, we developed expressions for the phase shift that occurs between the. Goos-Hänchen effect in microcavities. Microcavity modes created by non- specular reflections. This page is primarily motivated by our paper. these shifts as to the spatial and angular Goos-Hänchen (GH) and Imbert- Fedorov (IF) shifts. It turns out that all of these basic shifts can occur in a generic beam.
|Published (Last):||27 June 2012|
|PDF File Size:||13.74 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Goos-Hänchen effect in microcavities
If we look at an actual, finite, laser incident on an interface, it is not a plane wave. The phenomenon is actually wholly analogous to quantum tunnelling by a first quantised particle field described by e.
Measuring the intensity maximum of this reflected beam, one then observes a transverse displacement. The sift u, s in the middle is the one created in the bifurcation mentioned above.
Goos–Hänchen effect – Wikipedia
Newton gave both a theoretical basis and experimental evidence for penetration of light into medium 2 under conditions of total internal reflection. This effect is the linear polarization analog of the Imbert—Fedorov effect. If one new ray orbit creates a new mode, why doesn’t the other? You don’t quite have to solve the full Maxwell equations: The wave penetrates into the air and appears to travel parallel to it from left to right until the reflection forces it back into the dielectric heading toward the bottom right.
Although the interface between an elipse and the surrounding medium coincides with the coordinate lines of the elliptic cylinder coordinate systemthe wave field on the boundary cannot be assumed to have a constant value or constant derivatives, for that matter. IzhikevichEditor-in-Chief of Scholarpedia, the peer-reviewed open-access encyclopedia. Outside that region, the wave can clearly be called a “beam. The importance of individual rays increases drastically in systems where the WKB method breaks down, because that corresponds to the scenario where ray chaos may appear.
In this semiclassical limitthe uncertainty relations become less uncertain, and the ray picture becomes more accurate. This lateral shift can be explained in the simplest sense as resulting from the propagation of an evanescent wave parallel to the interface, or as a displacement of the wave in a time interval that can be interpreted as the time delay associated with the scattering process.
These equations were derived by Artmann Artmann K, the form of Eq. Although it is also possible to make a convincing argument for the existence of the effect in circular cavities there are some confusing questions that arise when generalizing to shapes like the ellipse.
This means in particular that the internal dynamics of the ellipse should not display any traces of chaotic ray orbits. That’s what’s shown in the last image. They goos-hancchen a substantial, negative lateral shift of the reflected beam in the plane of incidence for a p-polarization and a smaller, positive shift for the s-polarization case. So, in the lower medium, there is a field of the form:.
As shown in the figure, the superposition of two plane waves with slightly different angles of incidence but with the same frequency or wavelength is given by. It has finite extent, so it is a superposition of different plane waves which all have different angles of incidences.
So, in the lower medium, there is a field of the form: This effect continues to be a topic of scientific research, for example in the context of nanophotonics applications. You can see this in the first movie, and in the image on goos-hnachen left: Andy Huang 12 4. When total internal reflexion happens, the field isn’t abruptly turned around by the interface, it actually penetrates some distance beyond the interface as an evanescent field. So just watch episode of Numb3rs: This acts as an ideal curved mirror, and the cavity is closed off by a planar, dielectric multilayer Bragg mirror.
Some visualizations of how light penetrates the surface of a circular dielectric are shown on a spearate page. Both waves are reflected from the surface and good-hanchen different phase shifts, which leads to a lateral shift of the finite shivt. This effect occurs because the reflections of a finite sized beam will interfere along a line transverse to the average propagation direction.
We validated this claim in a fully vectorial, three-dimensional solution of Maxwell’s equations for a dome cavity with a dielectric mirror. Two distinct cases need be considered, polarization of the electric field perpendicular to the plane of incidence TE or transverse electric polarization and polarization parallel to goos-hanchsn plane of incidence TM or transverse magnetic polarization.
However, we did the calculations for a three-dimensional dome. We know a V-shaped ray must be self-retracingi.
The GHS was first discussed in the context of total internal reflection of electromagnetic radiation. Compared to general ovals of identical eccentricity, it is typically a good approximation to consider the dielectric ellipse as non-chaotic, as can be seen on this page discussing dynamical eclipsing. Theories of a lateral shift in total internal reflection of electromagnetic waves were developed by Picht Picht J, and by Schaefer and Pich Schaefer and Pich,