This tutorial provides hands-on step-by-step instructions on how to create a DoDAF-compliant architecture model of the operational view for a simplified land . “DoDAF Version serves as the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling the development of architectures to facilitate the. The tutorial will provide an introduction to the DoD Architecture Framework ( DoDAF). The tutorial will begin with a brief introduction to Enterprise Architecture .

Author: Mujora Dogore
Country: Jordan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 16 January 2012
Pages: 239
PDF File Size: 10.50 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.41 Mb
ISBN: 732-8-20210-756-2
Downloads: 54300
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Neshicage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”.

Commons category link is on Wikidata. DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.

Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.

UPDM – MDG Technology

The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.


These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.

A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. Move beyond disjoint architecture views and develop integrated architectures. Leverage integrated support to explore engineering, architecture, and business alternatives and deliver on your best enterprise solution with CORE.

Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.

To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i.

This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. It establishes a basis for semantic i.

The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view. One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. Retrieved from ” https: As one example, the DoDAF v1. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.


Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. Validate your architecture through integrated execution of your operational and system models. Rapidly verify dynamic integrity and evaluate candidate solutions to minimize cost and maximize insight.

Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the tutoril environment. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.

Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture.

In other projects Wikimedia Commons. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution.