1 feb. Eminescu-Interzis-Radu-Mihai-Crisan_carte Uploaded by. Iuliana Banu · Arheologia Interzisa-Istoria Ascunsa a Omenirii. Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu · Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu · Arheologia Interzisă Doc. Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu · Gentleman Nnn. Uploaded by. Clau Claudiu. stars2 of 5 stars3 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars. Arheologia interzisa. Istoria ascunsa a rasei umane (Paperback). Published January by MAR.
|Published (Last):||17 February 2005|
|PDF File Size:||11.83 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.98 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Cremo actually uses the Weekly World Arheolobia as a source in the book. For example, the Calaveras skull, alleged to be hundreds of thousands of years old, was dated to BP by radiocarbon dating methods Taylor et al I am surprised by the plethora of uncritical readers in this forum.
Excellent book for anyone interested in anthropology, archaeology, human origins. Interziza would be acceptable if this had been a peer reviewed and vetted text which was then published by an academic press but it was not Whether all their evidence stands up or not and they’re clear on ambiguities themselves the book is a strong lesson in preconceptions and the importance of remembering that theory is not fact, and should be open to constant re-assessment. I’ve never read it cover to cover, but I’ve read it in it’s entirety piece by piece.
A very deep book that challenges the academic assumptions and bias taught as fact. The authors look at each case individually, and discuss the technical data related to each case, both strengths and interziisa, and objectively discuss various viewpoints on the most well known cases. Have you ever had a friend who watched some shitty conspiracy theory documentary and then talked about it nonstop without ever actually analyzing the claims it made or checking to see how those claims had been addressed by experts?
Una bella sequenza di balle raccontate pure male, con scarsa coerenza interna e pure senza scorrevolezza.
This book gives the evidence that mankind has been on earth for thousands of years, but millions. Aug 27, Stuart Rimmer rated interziaa it was amazing. The proof is provided in great abundance, interzisx has rattled the cages of the worlds religions, political structure, and education institutions. Very interesting and informative. I would not recommend this book to a casual reader who is not obsessed with the origins of humankind. Arheolovia — Forbidden Archeology by Michael A.
It may be This is not an easy book to read. The gold necklace in ancient coal. His idea that there is some massive cover-up to keep the arheklogia that humans have been on the earth for millions of years is ridiculous.
My problem, and it is a personal one, is that I do not have the academic background to argue with them. Non sequitur su non sequitur. This book wasn’t what I thought. The reason the vast majority of scientists agree that we’ve been on earth less than that is because arheolofia what all the evidence points to. This book arheologiq me. I have read this huge volume, which details anthropological, paleontological and archaeological discoveries classified as “anomalies” because their very presence suggest that the conventional “facts” as established by a dogmatic scientific establishment, intolerant of challenges to their religion, three times now, and I plan to purchase this soon.
Refresh and try again. Written by scientists it arhwologia hard read but worth it if you are interested in the subject and offers a more realistic account of things than many of the more modern Alternative Archaeology books. Things like anatomically modern human bones recovered from rock strata millions of years old, and manufactured artifacts recovered from similarly ancient strata.
I have always been skeptical of some of the links in the evolutionary chain, and it has always been a nagging fascination of mine to find out more. Just amazing, what you won’t be taught at school.
Published December 15th by Torchlight Publishing first published Sep 07, Rich Hoffman rated it it was amazing. I hope Human Devolution is better than this one.
People who are convinced by this are most likely people who have a problem accepting the Theory of Evolution in the first place, scientifically illiterate people who haven’t taken a science class since high school.
Both the former and latter laws of archaeology must be satisfied to make Well, I guess controversy sells. Java Man, for instance, seems to rest on very shaky evidence.
Editions of Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael A. Cremo
May 31, Gevera Bert added it. Taylor, Richard, Louis A. His thesis is that there is evidence for a much older human presence on our planet than we traditionally acknowledge perhaps as much as Million years and that the evidence for a relatively young humanity 1 million years at most is shakier than we would like to think.
Want interzia Read Currently Reading Read. Cremo identifies himself as a “Vedic creationist. Of course, the authors would argue this is for thoroughness. It is essentially a textbook. This large volume serves as a reference compiling many lost, buried or otherwise hidden reports in the associated fields of archeology.
The book is very long and dense, cataloguing case after case after case of weak and anomalous evidence.
My biggest problem with this book was the deadening repetition of data and biographies that repeat themselves over and over and over again: Lots arueologia stuff to think about and not for arheilogia who are married to current scientific theory about human history.
Oct 02, Jai Joshi rated it it was amazing. My archaeology professor told me that this book was written by a wacko with fringe theories even though he had not read it.
Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
Had I not read this book, I would have continued regurgitating the same nonsense I was taught in my college level anthropology class, for lack of having any better information to process and share.
This book contains numerous examples of disregarded evidence just because it did not fit into the preconcieved notions of how things progressed, illustrating how anthropology and archaeology are not ‘sciences’ if one repeatedly disregards This book made me want to major in archaeology – unfortunately, many of the college professors out there are adament against anything outside of the timeline that they believe is set in stone, even now, almost a dozen years after this book was first published.
Listen to both sides of the discussion. Cremo sets out misinforming the reader about archaeological and geological site formation, confusing the “principle of stratigraphy” superposition with stratification.